Activity Response - Rubric
Discussions
This KB document is part of a larger collection of documents on discussions. More Discussion documents
Rubric to assess activity response discussion activities.
Rubric Example: Activity Response
Points | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quality of post | The concept was accurately defined and shows a strong understanding. | The concept was adequately defined but either revealed some issues or was not adequate in the depth. | The concept showed a significant misunderstanding or was cursory. | The concept was insufficiently developed, or no posting. |
Quality of response | Response to post either confirmed accuracy or corrected misperception successfully. Response built upon the initial concept in a meaningful way. | Response missed the inaccurate content or built on the initial concept in a post in a superficial manner. | Response provided some inaccurate information or built on content in a cursory manner. | No effort to make connections; or no comment posted. |
Relevance of post | The content represented a relevant concept from the online lecture. | The content represented a minor concept represented in the online lecture. | The content was not described in a manner that showed the ability to make connections to the content represented in the lecture | No effort was made to build connections or no posts. |